bench-the-judge's space

Quote

Re: Re: URGENT!!!!! Laura Smith Case I am going to repeat myself a lot in here: Regarding: "appearan

Dear Charlette Pugh Tall License Number P48780

 

Title

 

City Attorney Company

City of Benton Harbor

 

Address 1

107 Water St

 

Address 2

PO Box 247 City-State-ZIP Code

Benton Harbor, MI 49023

 

Phone (269) 934-7750

Fax (269) 934-7855

E-Mail cpughtall@cfaith.com

 

Regarding: AID & ABET TREASON pursuant to Equal Protection of Effective Assistance of Counsel when facing the Equivalent of the Death Penalty in 'non criminal court' and not facing criminal charges but getting put to death, Termination of Parental Rights.

 

Regarding: "appearance of impropriety" and "actual bias."

 

Judaical Rules of Conduct v REASONABLE EFFORTS the latter being the 'RULE' causing conflicts of law.

 

 Two 'rules of thumb' 'in' conflict:

 

REASONABLE EFFORTS is a prolonged Duress Tool in violation of your Right to a SPEEDY TRIAL.

 

                                                             TREASON:

 

The Judge has no jurisdiction when there is no criminal case where Charges 'in' Parenting Crimes has a Jury Conviction.

REASONABLE EFFORTS should not displace our Due Process rights because a judge can not require you have contact with your opponent, which is what REASONABLE EFFORTS is all about. (MAKING PARENTS OBEY).

 

                                                              TREASON:

----- Original Message ----
From: "ANGELAHAWK012@comcast.net" <ANGELAHAWK012@comcast.net>
To: blawglawg@yahoo.com; debbieandolino@msn.com; justice4court@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2008 12:27:16 PM
Subject: FW: Re: URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

well here you have it.. now to get Laura to do what she has to do .. Deb... Im leaving that up to you to email her and hopefully you can convince her to set aside here FEAR and go in for her own KILL..

Mother BEAR is the attitude she needs to have(( well maybe a lil calmer )) but you get me?

 

FindLaw: U.S. Constitution: Sixth Amendment: Annotations pg. 10 of 11

Effective Assistance of Counsel .--''[T]he right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel.'' 233 From the beginning of the cases ... caselaw..lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment06/10.html - 76k - Cached - Similar pages

FindLaw: U.S. Constitution: Sixth Amendment

... of the Right to Retained Counsel · Effective Assistance of Counsel · Self-Representation · Right to Assistance of Counsel in Nontrial Situations ... caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment06/ - 30k - Cached - Similar pages

Wiggins v. Smith: The Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard ...

Smith.4 This Note will first explore the Supreme Court's standard of effective assistance of counsel, which was established in 1984 in Strickland v. ... findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3975/is_200407/ai_n9454344 - 35k - Cached - Similar pages

Sentencing Advocacy and the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel

Sentencing Advocacy and the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel. The Sentencing Project. In the 40th year of Gideon, there is still much to be done to ... www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/articles_publications/publications/sentencing_advocacy_20030701 - 27k - Cached - Similar pages

Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel - Defined and Discussed!

"Murder defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel, .... See Goodpaster, The Trial for Life: Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death ... www.caught.net/caught/ineffec.htm - 137k - Cached - Similar pages

CRS/LII Annotated Constitution Sixth Amendment

Effective Assistance of Counsel.—“[T]he right to counsel is the right to the .... Also, “effective” assistance of counsel does not guarantee the accused a ... www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt6frag9_user.html - 35k - Cached - Similar pages

[PDF]

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat See Gary Goodpaster, The Trial for Life: Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death .... Effective Assistance of Counsel. 19. 27. See infra Chapters 3 and 7. ... www.press.umich.edu/pdf/0472099116-ch2.pdf - Similar pages

Criminal Law - Do I have a right to effective assistance of counsel?

A defendant does have the right to effective assistance of counsel through the first appeal. Proving ineffective assistance of counsel, however, ... www.quizlaw.com/criminal_law/do_i_have_a_right_to_effective.php - 10k - Cached - Similar pages

Arbitrary and Capricious: WA: in Grant County, novel "effective ...

WA: in Grant County, novel "effective assistance of counsel" concept causing havoc for prosecutor. The latest from Ephrata, by permission of a couple of ... skellywright.blogspot.com/2006/10/wa-in-grant-county-novel-effective.html - 182k - Cached - Similar pages

Enforcing the right to effective assistance of counsel | a public ...

5 responses about “Enforcing the right to effective assistance of counsel”. Audacity said: November 12th, 2007 at 11:49 am | ... apublicdefender.com/2007/11/12/enforcing-the-right-to-effective-assistance-of-counsel/ - 60k - Cached - Similar pages

Book results for Effective Assistance of Counsel
	The Right to the Assistance of Counsel: A ... - by James J. Tomkovicz - 258 pages Handbook on Antitrust Grand Jury Investigations - by American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law - 401 pages Wrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice - by Saundra Davis Westervelt, John A. Humphrey - 301 pages

Arizona v Wallen...

 

If they are going to terminate the judge is a criminal and has no jurisdiction when the equivalent of the death penalty is at steak.

 

That is a demonstration of bias when enforcing REASONABLE EFFORTS, (a sanctioned violation of Judicial Code of Conduct). Conflicts of Law...

Don't argue with those people they use everything against you, even a sigh.

 

Pleas Read, 'Before You Sign'.

 

Before You Sign.
Posted: 12/9/2007 8:00:18 PM	Read 118 times | 5 comments

Dear American, (Not to be confused with Amer-ee-kan )

Miranda will be given for you to sign, reserve your rights on this instrument by not becoming in personam at Rule 12 (b). Do not give up your personam to "power of attorney" because you waive rights with each admission or tacit response answered by "persons standing in your stead," which makes you in personam for accepting this "benefit." Remain SILENT and the reservation will command you to Justice. e-hem...

                Are Court Appointed Attorneys ...

'LONG ARM OF THE DHS': AS 'FELLOWSHIP OF THE DUPLICIT' 'in' 'LORD OF THE JURY'
Posted: 12/6/2007 5:54:20 PM	Read 66 times | 3 comments

Something is terribly wrong!!!!
Posted: 11/30/2007 5:56:36 PM	Read 128 times | 2 comments

 

Don't talk to the Court Appointed Attorney. Don't allow the courts to Appoint one... That makes you WARD OF THE COURT... The attorney can say, "Yes", even if you demand he say, "No".

 

If you already have a Court Appointed Attorney: Demand all communication be in the written format between you and him... ACCEPT NO PHONE CALLS... (NO PHONE CALLS ALLOWED by and between him and the non Criminal Prosecutor or CPS AGENTS).  As WARD OF THE COURT your Pen Power is vacant and you must file a refute and never talk to the CPS... Judicial Code of Conduct is the point to stand on here and a demend for your right to a SPEEDY TRIAL... (If your going to Terminate Parental Rights I demand a Grand Jury Indictment and if not: GO AWAY....

 

Supreme Law Library : Court Cases

---

U.S.A. v. Wallen

[Note: Small numbers indicate number of bytes in ASCII portion of files (sans HTML)]

---

Table of Contents

13592 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT DOCUMENTING CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING ARREST 11892 MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE FOR INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL 3686 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST FOR CREDENTIALS OF JOELYN D. MARLOWE 3737 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FOR VARIOUS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS 3356 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FOR VARIOUS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS 3275 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FOR CRIMINAL JURISDICTION OF USDC 3603 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FOR STANDING OF USA TO SUE AS PLAINTIFFS 2311 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT APPEAL 2318 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT APPEAL 4388 NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE 8644 NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE 5356 NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR THE RIGHT TO ENJOY THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL OF CHOICE 61490 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION FOR VIOLATING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT 16431 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH GRAND JURY SELECTION POLICY AND CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATUTE 105465 VERIFIED STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF CHALLENGE TO GRAND JURY SELECTION POLICY AND ITS FEDERAL STATUTE 9487 NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSE 5081 FINAL NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR PROOF OF POWER, STANDING, AND JURISDICTION 120533 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF CHALLENGE TO CRIMINAL JURISDICTION OF COURT 11911 CLOSING STATEMENT TO THE JURY 3144 NOTICE OF APPEAL 4379 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FROM ALL QUALIFIED ARTICLE III FEDERAL JUDGES 39707 NOTICE AND DEMAND TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF CRIMINAL JURISDICTION 8736 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-WAIVER OF EXTRADITION 9343 NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND PETITION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9228 NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND PETITION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13668 NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGE OF THE COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE TO PRESIDE OVER THE DCUS 4246 NOTICE OF FORMAL OBJECTION TO TRANSCRIPT FEE IMPOSED 5220 NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT AGAINST WILLIAM D. BROWNING 28594 COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

---

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law Library:   Court Cases

---

[Home]   [Write Us]  [Library]   [School]   [Forum]   [Subscribe]   [Donate]

---

Common Law Copyright
1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 A.D.:
Supreme Law Firm

email:   supremelawfirm@yahoo.com

Last Update:   August 5, 2002 A.D.

---

-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: Justice4court@aol.com
To: ANGELAHAWK012@comcast.net
Subject: Re: URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:50:14 +0000
>
> In a message dated 3/4/08 11:25:38 AM, ANGELAHAWK012@comcast.net writes:
>
>
> > might be difficult but all we are looking for is STALL TACTICS to keep
> > Thursday from happening!! If she files for a RECUSAL the JUDGE has to HAS TO
> > respond and the court hearing can NOT go forth!..
> >
>
> It's a good idea to stall and re group
>

 

Regarding: "appearance of impropriety" and "actual bias."

 

Judaical Rules of Conduct v REASONABLE EFFORTS the latter being the 'RULE' causing conflicts of law.

 

 Two 'rules of thumb' 'in' conflict:

 

REASONABLE EFFORTS is a prolonged Duress Tool in violation of your Right to a SPEEDY TRIAL.

 

                                                             TREASON:

 

The Judge has no jurisdiction when there is no criminal case where Charges 'in' Parenting Crimes has a Jury Conviction.

REASONABLE EFFORTS should not displace our Due Process rights because a judge can not require you have contact with your opponent, which is what REASONABLE EFFORTS is all about. (MAKING PARENTS OBEY).

 

                                                              TREASON:

-----Inline Message Follows-----


In a message dated 3/4/08 11:25:38 AM, ANGELAHAWK012@comcast.net writes:

might be difficult but all we are looking for is STALL TACTICS to keep Thursday from happening!! If she files for a RECUSAL the JUDGE has to HAS TO respond and the court hearing can NOT go forth!..

It's a good idea to stall and re group

Regarding: "appearance of impropriety" and "actual bias."

 

Judaical Rules of Conduct v REASONABLE EFFORTS the latter being the 'RULE' causing conflicts of law.

 

 Two 'rules of thumb' 'in' conflict:

 

REASONABLE EFFORTS is a prolonged Duress Tool in violation of your Right to a SPEEDY TRIAL.

 

                                                             TREASON:

 

The Judge has no jurisdiction when there is no criminal case where Charges 'in' Parenting Crimes has a Jury Conviction.

 

REASONABLE EFFORTS should not displace our Due Process rights because a judge can not require you have contact with your opponent, which is what REASONABLE EFFORTS is all about. (MAKING PARENTS OBEY).

 

                                                              TREASON:
 

 

In a message dated 3/4/08 11:25:38 AM, ANGELAHAWK012@comcast.net writes:

might be difficult but all we are looking for is STALL TACTICS to keep Thursday from happening!! If she files for a RECUSAL the JUDGE has to HAS TO respond and the court hearing can NOT go forth!..

It's a good idea to stall and re group

 

Regarding: "appearance of impropriety" and "actual bias."

 

Judaical Rules of Conduct v REASONABLE EFFORTS the latter being the 'RULE' causing conflicts of law.

 

 Two 'rules of thumb' 'in' conflict:

 

REASONABLE EFFORTS is a prolonged Duress Tool in violation of your Right to a SPEEDY TRIAL.

 

                                                             TREASON:

 

The Judge has no jurisdiction when there is no criminal case where Charges 'in' Parenting Crimes has a Jury Conviction.

 

REASONABLE EFFORTS should not displace our Due Process rights because a judge can not require you have contact with your opponent, which is what REASONABLE EFFORTS is all about. (MAKING PARENTS OBEY).

 

                                                              TREASON:

---

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.. Try it now.